Cedar Grove

Turn a local question into a defensible case.

Cedar Grove brings maintained public data, Lumecon collections and the records your organization governs into one project workspace. Build the evidence a grant, benefits report, feasibility study or economic impact analysis needs, then keep the source, release, geography, definition and limits attached to every figure.

A Cedar Grove analysis. The question reads: what evidence establishes the need for a community workforce program. A case structure lists need and baseline, who is underserved, funding and peer context, project readiness and local effects, each marked ready for evidence or needing a record. The figure beside it shows per capita income from 1990 to 2024 against the national line, labelled with its period, geography, universe and basis.
One analysis, open on its question and the parts of the case that answer it. Shown with sample data.

Three kinds of evidence, kept apart

A case fails review when a number is asked to prove something its source cannot support. Grove keeps the three layers distinct on the figure, in the evidence log and in every export, so what a sentence rests on travels with it.

  • Published, harmonized

    Maintained public data

    Baselines, denominators, trends and geography, read the same way across places and years so a comparison is a comparison. It establishes public conditions for a published geography, and nothing about your organization.

  • Maintained context

    Cedar collections

    Comparable organizations, awards, entities, policy and events that public tables do not carry on their own, each arriving with its own source and terms. It establishes what is true around you, not what is true inside you.

  • Yours, and only yours to release

    The records you govern

    Program, operating, budget and qualitative evidence your organization holds. It is the only layer that can settle a local fact about you, which is why Grove asks for it by name instead of letting a public average stand in.

Project workspace

Every case your organization has open.

Grove opens on the work in progress rather than on an empty page. Each analysis keeps its purpose, its place and the point it reached, so picking one up again does not start with working out what it was for.

Cedar Grove Home. A top bar names Home, Analyses, Data, Map and Cedar Impact. The open analyses list holds one feasibility study, and beside it a panel asks what you are preparing and offers five kinds of analysis: a grant case, an SBA 8(a) benefits report, a feasibility study, an economic-impact study, and evidence exploration.
The work already under way, and the five kinds of case Grove can open. Shown with sample data.

Geography as evidence

Read a measure off the map, geography by geography.

Choose a measure and the map fills every geography the record names with its value, on one scale with real breakpoints, and leaves plain what the record does not cover. Point at any geography, or reach it from the keyboard, and it reads out its value with the population, period and source attached, so the number and its provenance arrive together.

The Cedar Grove map workspace with labor force participation selected. The map is filled by the measure, one state tinted on a teal scale and every other geography left plain, and a readout anchored to the national outline reads 60.1 percent for the nation, AIAN alone, ACS 2020 to 2024. The same reading sits in the context card at the lower left, and a legend at the lower right names the class with its breakpoint, counts one of 186 geographies with a value, and lists the national figure.
One measure, filled and read out with its source and period. Shown with sample data.

Evidence that travels

Give reviewers the record behind the case.

Every figure filed into an analysis lands in its evidence log with the layer it came from, its source, the period observed, the geography, its role in the case and the limitation it carries. Pin a record and place it under the report requirement it supports, and a colleague, funder or board can read what the case rests on rather than rebuild it.

The evidence log of a Cedar Grove analysis, its header reading 3 records filed. A table lists four records: per capita income against the national figure, labor force participation, employment over time, and where the people working here live. Each row names its layer, source, period observed, geography, role and claim class, carries its stated limitation under the record name, and offers Inspect data beside a pin control. The first three are pinned, their control reading Unpin, and filed under report requirements, need and beneficiaries and measures, reporting and attachments; the fourth is not yet pinned, its control reading Pin. The first record carries the report wording already written.
The evidence log: each record with its source, limitation and place in the report. Shown with sample data.
  • Source

    Which published product or governed record the value came from.

  • Vintage

    Which release or reporting period is being read.

  • Geography

    The place measured, or the wider place used as a proxy.

  • Definition

    The measure and population the number actually represents.

  • Limitation

    What the evidence cannot be asked to establish.

  • Reproduce

    The code and rows needed to rebuild the figure.

Evidence infrastructure

The collections behind the evidence.

Cedar collections add maintained context that public tables do not provide on their own. Open one to see what it contributes, how Lumecon has resolved it, its coverage and the terms that govern the records.

Federal Funding to Indian Country

Federal assistance transactions reported for Native nations, organizations, enterprises and other identified recipients, including grants, loans and direct payments. Follow funding by recipient, program, agency, amount and year.

What Lumecon resolved
Recipients resolved to the Native entity behind them, so an award to a subsidiary, a housing authority or a consortium is attributed to the nation or organization it belongs to.
Coverage
Records from fiscal year 2007
Sources
USAspending assistance award archive and API
Terms
Public records. The resolution to Native entities is Lumecon’s work.

Federal Register

Federal Register notices and agency actions concerning tribes, Native organizations, lands, resources, recognition and other Indian Country matters. Follow published actions, consultations and comment periods across agencies and time.

What Lumecon resolved
Notices matched to the tribes, lands and organizations they name, including entities that appear under former or variant names.
Coverage
Records from 1994
Sources
federalregister.gov API
Terms
Public records. The resolution to Native entities is Lumecon’s work.

Congressional Votes and Proposed Legislation

Bills, resolutions, sponsorship and roll-call votes concerning tribes and Indian Country. Follow legislation from introduction through congressional action and examine sponsorship and voting records.

What Lumecon resolved
Bills and votes tied to the tribes and Native organizations they affect, not only to the sponsors who filed them.
Coverage
Records from 1973, thin and gapped through the 1980s
Sources
congress.gov API for bills, actions and cosponsors; House and Senate roll-call records
Terms
Public records. The resolution to Native entities is Lumecon’s work.

Indian Country Deals

Material transactions and capital commitments involving Native nations, organizations and enterprises, including acquisitions, divestitures, property purchases, investments, financing agreements, bond issuances, joint ventures and major capital projects. Track who participated, the Native entity involved, announced value, status and timing, and compare activity across periods.

What Lumecon resolved
Buyers, sellers, borrowers and issuers resolved to tribal governments, tribally owned enterprises, ANCs and NHOs.
Coverage
Records from 2000
Sources
Transaction announcements, agency records and Federal Register land and trust actions, manually reviewed
Terms
Public records. The resolution to Native entities is Lumecon’s work.

NAGPRA

Public records of activity under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, including notices, inventories and repatriation-related actions. Follow records by institution, Native entity, notice type and date.

What Lumecon resolved
Notices matched to the tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations named in them, across the naming changes of three decades.
Coverage
Records from 1994, the first notice published under the Act
Sources
NAGPRA notices as published in the Federal Register
Terms
Public records. The resolution to Native entities is Lumecon’s work.

Native Federal Advocacy and Engagement

Documented federal advocacy and engagement involving Native nations and organizations, including registered lobbying, agency meetings, tribal consultations, regulatory comments, congressional testimony and nonprofit lobbying disclosures. Each row represents one entity-linked activity or source record.

What Lumecon resolved
Each activity, from a lobbying registration to a consultation, a docket filing or testimony, resolved to the tribe or Native organization behind it where the record supports the link; a row the record cannot place keeps its printed party name and a blank key rather than a guess.
Coverage
Records from 1999
Sources
Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings, tribal consultation notices, congressional hearing records and Federal Register ex parte notices
Terms
Public records. The resolution to Native entities is Lumecon’s work.

Foundation and Corporate Giving

Foundation, corporate and bank funding publicly disclosed for Native nations, organizations and initiatives. Follow the funder, legal recipient, purpose, geography, amount and timing while keeping commitments, payments, authorizations and other reported financial statuses distinct.

What Lumecon resolved
Philanthropic, corporate and bank giving, each disclosure kept as its own record: commitments and payments are separate facts, and the legal recipient is kept distinct from the Native beneficiary.
Sources
Public filings and funders’ own published announcements, each disclosure cited to the document it came from
Terms
Disclosures are a view of funding, not a ledger to total; overlapping reports of the same award are reviewed rather than added.

Federal Prime Contracting

Federal contract transactions awarded directly to Native governments, enterprises, organizations and identified Native-owned businesses. Examine awarding agencies, recipients, industries, obligations, procurement mechanisms and set-asides.

What Lumecon resolved
Vendors resolved to tribally owned firms, ANC and NHO subsidiaries and 8(a) participants, then rolled up to the parent nation or corporation.
Coverage
Records from fiscal year 2000, where Native identification begins in the federal record; refreshed quarterly
Sources
FPDS-NG feed, USAspending award data and SAM contract awards
Terms
Public records. The resolution to Native entities is Lumecon’s work.

Federal Subcontracting

Reported federal subawards to Native entities and businesses beneath prime contracts. Follow the prime relationship, subrecipient, amount, industry and timing of reported subcontracting activity.

What Lumecon resolved
Subawards matched to the same resolved entities as the prime contracts above them.
Coverage
Records from fiscal year 2010, the statutory reporting floor
Sources
USAspending FSRS subaward data
Terms
Filer-reported and unaudited. Totals are stated with that limit.

Natural Resource Revenues

Public records of energy and mineral production, revenues, royalties and related disbursements associated with tribal trust and restricted lands. Compare reported activity by commodity, Native entity, location and period.

What Lumecon resolved
Production and disbursements matched to the nations and allottees they belong to.
Coverage
Records from 1880, through retrospectively published headright payments
Sources
ONRR Natural Resources Revenue Data and retrospectively published disbursement records
Terms
Public records. The resolution to Native entities is Lumecon’s work.

Individually Owned Native Businesses

Individually owned Native businesses identified through tribal TERO offices, commerce programs and other documented Native-business registries. Records preserve the issuing source, reported affiliation or certification, location and industry where available.

What Lumecon resolved
Every listing carries the nation whose office certified it, appears only under that nation’s stated terms, and is credited to the issuing TERO or commerce office.
Coverage
A roster as captured on 2026-09-01; certifying offices archive no superseded lists
Sources
Nations’ TERO and commerce offices, shared with the project office by office
Terms
A listing appears only under its nation’s stated terms.

Native Nonprofits

A maintained roster of Native-led, Native-serving and Native-focused nonprofit organizations, with EINs and available federal filing information kept distinct by organization type. Identify organizations and connect them to other Cedar records without treating Native-led and Native-serving as the same thing.

What Lumecon resolved
Filers classified as Native-led, Native-serving or Native-focused, which are three different things and are labeled separately.
Coverage
A register as captured on 2026-04-29, one row per filer with its latest period
Sources
IRS Business Master File monthly extracts
Terms
Public records. The classification is Lumecon’s work and stays reviewable.

Cedar Native Entity Enterprise Dataset (Cedar NEED)

Enterprises owned or controlled by Native nations, Alaska Native corporations and other Native entities, including subsidiaries, holding companies and joint ventures. Follow parent relationships and organizational changes over time. Where records are available, profiles also carry patents, assigned or later acquired, and dated credit ratings, each kept with the entity it concerns.

What Lumecon resolved
This is the structure the rest of the record resolves against, published as a collection in its own right: every tie names the nation or corporation behind it.
Coverage
Observations from 2016, the earliest year any source named an enterprise or a tie
Sources
Entity records, enterprise registers and filings, reconciled edition by edition
Terms
Unresolved ties stay unresolved. A provisional match is labeled provisional.

PLOT

Parcel-level ownership and development records associated with Native nations, organizations and enterprises. Follow ownership, transfers, parcel characteristics, geometry, permits and other recorded property activity over time.

What Lumecon resolved
Land ownership, transfers, permitting and development, followed parcel by parcel: each parcel and the recorded events attached to it, linked to the Native entity that holds it.
Sources
Statewide and county parcel GIS, county assessor and property-tax records, building permit and inspection records, and environmental permits and reviews
Terms
Public records. The resolution to Native entities is Lumecon’s work.

Gaming Intelligence

Tribal gaming across the whole operation: facilities, ownership and affiliation over time, compacts, licenses, slot machine and table counts where published, sports wagering, payouts, employment and labor records, marketing, expansions, environmental reviews, declination letters, litigation and transaction history, cross-validated against Deals.

What Lumecon resolved
Facilities matched to their operators and their owners. This is the one collection where the counterparties are not all Native: management companies and outside operators are resolved and labeled as such.
Coverage
Records from 1979, the first documented year of high-stakes tribal gaming
Sources
NIGC reports and opinions, BIA gaming compacts, state gaming licenses and payment records, casino websites and marketing material, sports-wagering disclosures, labor and employment records, facility directories, NEPA environmental reviews and gaming litigation
Terms
Public records. The resolution to operators and owners is Lumecon’s work.

One license per organization

Cedar Grove, for your whole organization.

A Grove belongs to the organization, not to a seat. Everyone works from the same evidence record, with the same sources, coverage and history.

Onboarding is done with you. We anchor Grove to the places that matter, connect the public programs that publish them and set up the records you want layered over the gaps.

Grove stands on its own. In a Tree account, Cedar Impact and Cedar Commons work beside the same evidence base. Compare plans.

$2,500per organization, per year

  • Unlimited users in one organization
  • Maintained Lumecon collections and new releases
  • Project evidence logs and coverage checks
  • Figures, data exports and reproducibility bundles
  • Cedar, grounded in the evidence you have selected
Request Grove

Prefer to talk first? contact@lumecon.ai

Also from Lumecon. Use Grove to prepare evidence for Cedar Impact, then attach a completed impact result to the same project with its approved assumptions and source trail intact.

See Cedar Impact